<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deutsche Bank Pulls Pricing from Aggregators</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.shiftforex.com/deutsche-bank-pulls-pricing-from-aggregators/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.shiftforex.com/deutsche-bank-pulls-pricing-from-aggregators/</link>
	<description>Forex for everyone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:20:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.shiftforex.com/deutsche-bank-pulls-pricing-from-aggregators/comment-page-1/#comment-575</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiftforex.com/?p=203#comment-575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to my knowledge. Our suspicion is that it is very difficult for them to control the client flow they receive when they are at least one step removed from their customer. This means they face potentially hazardous flows (AKA toxic flows) from the likes of algorithmic traders, arbitrageurs (particularly latency arbs), and other high frequency traders. The end result? The flows they do get from these venues are probably not nearly as profitable as what they get from their core direct customers. So it seems like a strategic decision to focus on their core business. Again, this is not their statement but our commentary on the move.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to my knowledge. Our suspicion is that it is very difficult for them to control the client flow they receive when they are at least one step removed from their customer. This means they face potentially hazardous flows (AKA toxic flows) from the likes of algorithmic traders, arbitrageurs (particularly latency arbs), and other high frequency traders. The end result? The flows they do get from these venues are probably not nearly as profitable as what they get from their core direct customers. So it seems like a strategic decision to focus on their core business. Again, this is not their statement but our commentary on the move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristy</title>
		<link>http://www.shiftforex.com/deutsche-bank-pulls-pricing-from-aggregators/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 23:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.shiftforex.com/?p=203#comment-433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has Deutsche Bank said why they have stopped providing FX pricing to most of its liquidity aggregator customers?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has Deutsche Bank said why they have stopped providing FX pricing to most of its liquidity aggregator customers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
